翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Artus Court ・ Artus de Lionne ・ Artus de Penguern ・ Artus Gheerdinck ・ Artus Gouffier, Lord of Boissy ・ Artus Quellinus (disambiguation) ・ Artus Quellinus II ・ Artus Quellinus III ・ Artus Quellinus the Elder ・ Artus Wolffort ・ Artus-Excalibur ・ Artush and Zaur ・ Artush Galstyan ・ Artusi ・ Artux ・ Artuz v. Bennett ・ Artuš Scheiner ・ ARTV (Chile) ・ ARTV (disambiguation) ・ ARtv (Portugal) ・ Artvin ・ Artvin (electoral district) ・ Artvin Dam ・ Artvin Hopaspor ・ Artvin Province ・ Artvin Çoruh University ・ Artviže ・ Artvoice ・ Artwall ・ ArtWatch International Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Artuz v. Bennett ： ウィキペディア英語版 Artuz v. Bennett ''Artuz v. Bennett'', (531 U.S. 4 ) (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2000. The case concerned whether a habeas corpus petition ''tolled'' for time under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 when certain state claims are still pending. The Court held that it did not. ==Opinion of the Court== Justice Scalia delivered the unanimous decision for the Court, which held that an application for postconviction relief containing procedurally barred claims is properly filed within the meaning of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. Only the specific claims and not the actual filing of the claims could be defaulted under state law, he argued. "An application is 'filed', as that term is commonly understood," Scalia wrote, "when it is delivered to, and accepted by, the appropriate state officer for placement into the official record". In the present case, the Court had not issued a written dismissal, just an oral decision from the bench. That would not count toward the tolling of the habeas claim. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Artuz v. Bennett」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.